Issue #42: In defense of beef - Heart & Soil Supplements Issue #42: In defense of beef - Heart & Soil Supplements

Evidence based

| 7 min read

Issue #42: In defense of beef

Hey Radical Health Seekers šŸ‘‹

This week in your Radical Health Newsletter weā€™re coming to the defense of beefā€¦

And arming you with scientific evidence to dispel the most common arguments people throw its way.

We believe beef is one of the best things you can eat for radical healthā€¦

Because not only is it incredibly nutritiousā€¦

But itā€™s also accessible, affordable and delicious.

Yet many people have concerns about eating beefā€¦ 

Because for decades now, weā€™ve been told that if it isnā€™t killing us, itā€™s killing the planet.

But are those beliefs based on unbiased scientific evidence?

No. 

Because in science, money talks.

For example, this paper from 2022 found that 95% of the committee members for the newest USDA Dietary Guidelines had conflicts of interest with the food and pharmaceutical industriesā€¦

And somehow, top nutrition researchers now deem it fit to rank Frosted Mini-Wheats above REAL foods like ground beef:

Look, money clearly talks.

And big food companies fund a ton of nutritional research in order to skew the results in their favorā€¦

So that their products can then be promoted as the healthiest option despite being anything but.

Consequently, most people donā€™t know who to trust for nutrition advice, and their health suffersā€¦

The food companies continue to make bankā€¦

And ACTUAL food is demonized.

Now of all the demonized foods, beef is probably top of the pileā€¦

But humans have been eating beef (or itā€™s equivalent) for millions of years.

Because throughout human history, weā€™ve favored meat (and organs) from the biggest, fattest grass-eating mammals we could find.

And the closest modern-day equivalent that is widely available is beef.

Meat made us human.

ā€œBut doesnā€™t beef increase my risk of heart disease and other chronic diseases?ā€

We all have an ā€˜Uncle Joeā€™ or ā€˜Aunt Margeā€™ who had a stroke or heart attackā€¦

And we bet most of your family believed it was because of all the saturated fat in the steaks they were eatingā€¦

Mainstream authorities like the American Heart Association and the USDA STILL recommend limiting beef intake because of its saturated fat contentā€¦Even though we now have many studies confirming that saturated fat is NOT associated with heart disease and other chronic diseases (1234).

This 2020 study concluded that unprocessed red meat is not associated with heart disease:  

ā€œThere is no robust evidence that current population-wide arbitrary upper limits on saturated fat consumption in the United States will prevent CVD or reduce mortality.ā€

ā€œBut beef does cause cancer, right?ā€

For decades, mainstream nutritional wisdom has said so, but this advice emerged from epidemiological studies showing correlation, not causationā€¦

And the studies also frequently fail to correct for unhealthy user bias (e.g. those that eat red meat also might eat unprocessed foods and drink alcohol).

Plus, we now have newer, higher-quality review studies that indicate otherwise, like this study from 2019:

Itā€™s one of the most comprehensive to date, which looked at data from 48 studies with over 5.7 million participantsā€¦

And concluded that the recommendations to limit red meat intake based on cancer concerns were bogus (you can read what they say here).

And thereā€™s this 2019 study:

Which concludes:

ā€œThe possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very lowā€ 

ā€œOk, ok, but what about all the studies that show vegetarians live longer?ā€

This is another example of ā€œif you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe itā€…

But itā€™s a belief based on more bogus science, with more weak correlations that fail to correct for healthy user bias.

For example, many of the studies showing positive correlations between vegetarians and lifespan fail to correct for the fact that health-conscious vegetarians often avoid alcohol and ultra-processed foods tooā€¦ 

So which factor is responsible for their long life? The lack of meat or the lack of junk food?

And we now have evidence to indicate the opposite, like this recent study:

Here, the authors conclude that the more meat people eat, the longer they live! 

And then thereā€™s the fact that Hong Kong has the highest meat consumption per capita AND highest life expectancy per capita combined (yes itā€™s true, Google it)ā€¦

It may be a correlation, but it sure flies in the face of the belief that you must eat less ground beef if you want to live a long life.

ā€œYeah, yeah, ok Iā€™m now convinced beef won’t kill meā€¦

But wonā€™t beef kill the planet? šŸ˜¦šŸŒŽ ā€

Of all the arguments floated against eating beef, the climate change argument is certainly having its momentā€¦

And weā€™re now supposed to believe that to be a responsible citizen, we should skip the beef and eat beans or Beyond Burgers instead.

But there are SO many issues with this.

Firstly, beef is one of the most nutritious foods on the planet.

So any decision to swap real beef with fake beef must consider the negative impacts on human health.

This study did just that. 

It examined eliminating all animal foods from the American diet and found that emissions would only be reduced by 2.6%…

Yet found that nutrient deficiencies would increase, and total calories would increase. 

This isnā€™t desirable when most people are already overweight or obese and simultaneously suffering from nutrient deficiencies!

And then consider the fact that there have always been methane-burping ruminants in North Americaā€¦

(as many as 60 million bison in the 1800s)

And that according to our own EPA, beef production is only responsible for 1.9% of total emissions in 2016:

Or what about the fact that when properly raised (in a regenerative fashion), cattle can be a net positiveā€¦

Because they help put carbon back into the soil, and regenerate land previously degraded from monocrop agriculture.

Now we arenā€™t saying beef production has no environmental impactā€¦

But circling back to the issue of biased research, and money talkingā€¦

Youā€™ll have to forgive us if we approach the subject with skepticism.

And you donā€™t need to agree with our defense of beefā€¦

But we hope weā€™ve encouraged you to ask some questionsā€¦

And that the information weā€™ve provided you with today helps you on your journey to radical health.

Speaking of which, weā€™ve just about enough space left to meet our.

Radical Health Hero Of The Week šŸ‘Š

This is Diane and she is absolutely crushing it on an animal-based diet!

Hereā€™s what she told us:

ā€œOn the left is when I first started. On the right is now 2 years later. 

I wasnā€™t just doing this because of my weight. 

My weight gain was just an unfortunate side effect of stress, hypothyroidism, Hashimoto’s, depression and I can go onā€¦ It took a lot of trial and error. 

The best decision I ever made was to take charge of my own health. šŸ„° ā€

We are STOKED for Diane’s success! šŸ™Œ

And if you have an incredible story like Dianeā€™s, please share it with us!

If we feature it in the newsletter, weā€™ll send you a free bottle of your favorite Heart & Soil supplement in appreciation šŸ™ŒšŸ¼

>> Go here to share your story

Thatā€™s all from us this weekend šŸ‘‹šŸ¼

Stay Radical!

The Heart & Soil Team

Subscribe to future articles like this:

Enjoyed this read?
Get new articles